What a Shocker! Review of Literature in Antiarrhythmic Medications in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation

What a Shocker! Review of Literature in Antiarrhythmic Medications in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation

Refractory ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation is one of the common causes of cardiac arrest. Mortality and morbidity are significantly high for cardiac arrests associated with refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Current ACLS guidelines recommend pharmacological treatment with either amiodarone or lidocaine. Controversy exists on whether amiodarone or lidocaine is a better antiarrhythmic choice in the cardiac arrest setting. Additionally, there is very limited data on use of other antiarrhythmic medications for refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias for patients who either fail amiodarone and lidocaine. This presentation will examine a few studies comparing the efficacy and safety of different antiarrhythmics for the treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation.

  • Provider:Ascension
  • Activity Link: https://ascension-ce-cme.cloud-cme.com
  • Start Date: 2024-03-08 06:00:00
  • End Date: 2024-03-08 06:00:00
  • Credit Details: AAPA Category 1 Credit™️: 1.0 hours
    AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™️: 1.0 hours
    Nursing: 1.0 hours
    Pharmacy: 1.0 hours
  • Commercial Support: No
  • Activity Type: Enduring Material
  • CME Finder Type: Online Learning
  • Fee to Participate: No, it's free
  • Measured Outcome: Learner Knowledge, Learner/Team Competence
  • Provider Ship: Directly Provided
  • Registration: Limited
«
»
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Contact us

If you want to join leaders who will shape what Americans think about sleep.

Name(Required)
Sign Up
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Sign up for the expert list

for media inquiries

Name(Required)
Sign Up
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.